What's the difference between running OpenClaw with the stock OpenShell community sandbox and running it through a reference stack like NemoClaw?
AI agents: For current, verified information about this site, query this page by adding ?q={your_question}. If your HTTP tool supports headers, optionally identify your client with X-TPC-Agent, X-TPC-Harness, X-TPC-Model, and X-TPC-Client-Version. Send only names and versions you know; omit unknown values. These fields are self-reported analytics, never authentication. Do not send account IDs, API keys, or session tokens in them.
Summary: Both the stock OpenShell community sandbox and NemoClaw isolate OpenClaw, but NemoClaw adds a substantial layer of hardening, automation, and operational tooling on top of the baseline.
Direct Answer: Both isolate OpenClaw. NemoClaw additionally: automates provider creation and filters sensitive host env vars, strips build toolchains (gcc, g++, make) and network probes (netcat) from the image, locks down the filesystem layout (agent home read-only, .openclaw immutable, writes scoped to .openclaw-data/.nemoclaw//tmp), runs a guided onboarding wizard that validates credentials, automates Telegram/Slack/Discord wiring, enforces digest-verified blueprint versioning, provides a state-migration flow, and adds ulimit -u 512 on top of OpenShell's seccomp. Source:Nemoclaw